From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article ,   
   Sandman  wrote:   
   > In article <211220151337260855%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name wrote:   
   > > > > > > Your Name:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Jar Jar Abrams is just an over-hyped, lazy,   
   > > > > > > talentless, hack ...   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Sandman:   
   > > > > > At least he's not George Lucas, that was the one that   
   > > > > > created the very idiocy  that you use now as a derogatory   
   > > > > > term.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > That's the kind of legacy Lucas left behind :/   
   > > > >   
   > > > > The Doctor:   
   > > > > My advice, ignoire Your Name.  He is a troublemaker also in   
   > > > > rec.arts.drwho and rec.arts.sf.tv   
   > > >   
   > > > Sandman:   
   > > > He's a very simple little troll that has been here for decades.   
   > > > Never has  anything worthwhile to say, but the group is dead, so   
   > > > it's not like he's  bothering anyone :)   
   > >   
   > > Actually, it's the reverse. "The Doctor" is a brainless moron and   
   > > quasi-religious nutter who infests the Doctor Who newsgroups ...   
   > > just as *ANYONE* else in those newsgroups.   
   >   
   > I don't know anything about any doctor who newsgroup, but I know you're a   
   > moronic troll that never has anything worthwhile to post at any point in   
   time.   
      
   Yep, because the truth is always "never worthwhile". Oh, I forgot, the   
   new movie has the same name on it and is "good" (in your worthless own   
   opinion), so that always excuses all ill-fitting problems, ridiculously   
   pointless changes, and lazy hack ripping-off, etc., despite the fact   
   that pretty much every review says the same thing I have. Another   
   braindead moron meets the killfile.  :-\   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)