home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc      Miscellaneous topics pertaining to Star      25,718 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 25,341 of 25,718   
   Your Name to darth_azrael@yahoo.com   
   Re: =?utf-8?Q?Re:=20More=20than=20one=20   
   27 Aug 16 10:32:19   
   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article <4v2wz.1559$SX5.1464@fx01.iad>, Cyber kNight   
    wrote:   
   >   
      
   >   
   > Sort of ironic mentioning the irrelevancy of my opinion while referring to   
   > the opinions of others AND stating an   
   opinion about what "most" peoples'   
   > opinion is (unless you have numbers to back that up anyway).   
      
   As I said, those are the usual main complaints. I don't think I've ever   
   come across anyone else complaining that Episode I / Prequel Trilogy   
   was a "confused mess".   
      
      
      
      
   > I think the words above are reasonably clear. :-\   
      
   Well you obviously failed to understand them then.   
      
      
      
      
      
   > The alternate timeline is a mechanism for doing a reboot, not a disguise of   
   > one.   
      
   Then you failed to understand JJ Abrams' StarDrek as well.   
      
      
      
      
   > Most people don't think so. Not sure why you think your opinion is more   
   > relevant. It's as irrelevant as mine is.   
      
   As I said, it's an easily observable fact by simply forcing yourself to   
   watch any of the garbage he makes and MANY MANY MANY people know it ...   
   unfortunately almost none of those people are in Hollyweird management,   
   so they keep hiring the moron.  :-(   
      
      
      
   > Disney is in charge, not Abrams. His involvement is minimal in the next   
   > episode.   
      
   Abrams *is* in charge and he will have the almost final say on   
   everything, short of a Disney / Lucasfilm suit having the balls to tell   
   him "no" (which thanks to his massively over-hyped "genius" status in   
   their eyes, isn't likely to happen).   
      
   The fact that he completely screwed up Episode VII by also (supposedly)   
   helping to write it isn't really relevant.   
      
      
      
      
   > Just because a movie is not what you expect or want or like does not   
   > make it crap though it may be crap in your *opinion*. Others may have   
   > different opinions and clearly do.   
      
   It's all an OBSERVABLE FACT ... observable facts are not opinions.   
      
   Fact:   
      Episode VII is largely just a lazy, talentless rip-off of   
      the original movie / Original Trilogy. Anyone with eyes,   
      ears, and a working brain can see that from the other side   
      of the universe - virtually every scene is a knock-off.   
      
   Fact:   
      JJ Abrams is a lazy talentless hack who makes a mess of   
      everything he touches, then gets bored and moves on leaving   
      the mess for someone else to try and tidy up.   
      
   Opinion:   
      JJ Abrams is a cretin - there's no way to observe / prove   
      that.   
      
      
   But, you believe whatever you want. I'm done with this topic. I haven't   
   got the time nor desire to bother with it anymore (especially   
   continually trying to tidy up the mess your newsreader / forum makes of   
   the text).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca