From: darth_azrael@yahoo.com
Your Name wrote on Fri, 26 August 2016 18:32
> In article <4v2wz.1559$SX5.1464@fx01.iad>, Cyber kNight
> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Sort of ironic mentioning the irrelevancy of my
> > opinion while referring to
> > the opinions of others AND stating an
> opinion about what "most" peoples'
> > opinion is (unless you have numbers to back that up
> > anyway).
>
> As I said, those are the usual main complaints. I don't
> think I've ever
> come across anyone else complaining that Episode I /
> Prequel Trilogy
> was a "confused mess".
>
>
>
>
> > I think the words above are reasonably clear. :-\
>
> Well you obviously failed to understand them then.
I understood them just fine. Even quoted back to you what I
was referring to.
Quote:
> > The alternate timeline is a mechanism for doing a
> > reboot, not a disguise of
> > one.
>
> Then you failed to understand JJ Abrams' StarDrek as
> well.
Not thinking an alternate timeline is a "disguise" is hardly
failing to understand something.
Quote:
> > Most people don't think so. Not sure why you think
> > your opinion is more
> > relevant. It's as irrelevant as mine is.
>
> As I said, it's an easily observable fact by simply
> forcing yourself to
> watch any of the garbage he makes and MANY MANY MANY
> people know it ...
> unfortunately almost none of those people are in
> Hollyweird management,
> so they keep hiring the moron. :(
They keep hiring him because his films keep making money.
It's really as simple as that. His films make money because
a large number of people like them and go see them even
though you may not.
Quote:
> > Disney is in charge, not Abrams. His involvement is
> > minimal in the next
> > episode.
>
> Abrams *is* in charge and he will have the almost final
> say on
> everything, short of a Disney / Lucasfilm suit having
> the balls to tell
> him "no" (which thanks to his massively over-hyped
> "genius" status in
> their eyes, isn't likely to happen).
>
> The fact that he completely screwed up Episode VII by
> also (supposedly)
> helping to write it isn't really relevant.
He is not in charge and repeatedly saying so does not make
it true.
Quote:
> > Just because a movie is not what you expect or want
> > or like does not
> > make it crap though it may be crap in your
> > *opinion*. Others may have
> > different opinions and clearly do.
>
> It's all an OBSERVABLE FACT ... observable facts are not
> opinions.
>
> Fact:
> Episode VII is largely just a lazy, talentless
> rip-off of
> the original movie / Original Trilogy. Anyone with
> eyes,
> ears, and a working brain can see that from the other
> side
> of the universe - virtually every scene is a
> knock-off.
>
> Fact:
> JJ Abrams is a lazy talentless hack who makes a mess
> of
> everything he touches, then gets bored and moves on
> leaving
> the mess for someone else to try and tidy up.
>
> Opinion:
> JJ Abrams is a cretin - there's no way to observe /
> prove
> that.
>
>
> But, you believe whatever you want. I'm done with this
> topic. I haven't
> got the time nor desire to bother with it anymore
> (especially
> continually trying to tidy up the mess your newsreader /
> forum makes of
> the text).
You have no idea what the difference between a fact and an
opinion is. Next you'll be telling me to get off your lawn.
--
http://www.megalextoria.com/wordpress
--
--> http://www.megalextoria.com/forum2 <--
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
