3b9a83f1   
   From: removeantispam*pkuo@earthlink.net   
      
   In article ,   
    Travers Naran  wrote:   
      
   > mechdan@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > > ...but still, I find almost all of Rowling's pairings to feel   
   > > forced and a bit flat.  Harry-Cho, Hermione-Krump, Hermione-Ron,   
   > > Harry-Ginny...they all lacked "chemistry".   
      
   > I disagree about Hermione-Ron.  They had great chemistry for the last 4   
   > books.  Harry-Cho was the usual teenage infatuation.  Hermione-Krump is   
      
   Hermione and Krump are just your typical jock going after the best girl   
   in a school, I wonder about the movie casting, the guy who play Krump is   
   so rough looking it will be hard to believe that anything could happen   
   between them.   
      
   it is a very strange set up in a way, you usually can tell in a school   
   who is the "king" and "queen", neither Harry or Hermione fit the typical   
   roles of such,   
      
   > all too realistic shallow teen romance.  Harry-Ginny, well... I wish   
   > Rowling had developed Ginny as a character more before forcing it upon   
   > us.  I figured that was the goal in the 2nd book (with the valentine   
   > hint in a later book).   
      
   I wonder if she caved into fan demand? that pairing is certianly the   
   most popular one.   
      
   >  > Harry and Hermione   
   > > had chemistry.  Harry and Luna had chemistry.  Hermione and   
   > > Draco had chemistry.   
      
   > You call that "chemistry"?  :-O   
      
   GUNPOWDER is chemistry.   
      
   > But then again, maybe I'm too into the "yuri" because I think a   
   > Cho-Fleur relationship would be more interesting. ;-)   
      
   only if Rowling give us sex in #7, don't think so, would be nice? ^^;   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)