XPost: rec.arts.anime.misc   
   From: daken@verizon.net   
      
   On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:34:27 GMT, robkelk@deadspam.com (Rob Kelk)   
   wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:48:26 -0500, Galen Musbach   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:35:16 -0500, Galen Musbach   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>Read or Dream: 16+   
   >>   
   >>Why is Read or Dream 16+? Wouldn't 10+ fit better?   
   >>The label says "sexual themes", but there aren't any.   
   >   
   >So far, there's been one panel with full-frontal female nudity.   
   >   
   >_*One_* panel.   
   >   
   >In a non-sexual situation.   
      
   Well it's not like she DIDN'T try to seduce Anita, albeit in one of   
   the hamfisted attempts at seductuion we've seen lately.   
      
   Me?  I'm holding out for bestiality to rear its head, putting R.O.D.   
   firmly into 18+ territory.   
      
   (No, Orion!  Not there!  Bad Kitty!  BAAAAAD KITTY.)   
   --   
   Abraham Evangelista   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)