Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.manga    |    All aspects of the Japanese storytelling    |    7,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,966 of 7,759    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=A7=F1=FChw=A4=A3f?= to All    |
|    Re: M. Night Shyamalan directs... POKEMO    |
|    17 Aug 10 16:10:20    |
      XPost: alt.fan.furry, rec.arts.anime.misc       From: snuhwolf@yahoo.com              Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:       > §ñühw¤£f wrote:       >> Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:       >>> §ñühw¤£f wrote:       >>>> Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:       >>>>> B Sellers wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> We finished off the Cold War but so far Nuclear Disarmament       >>>>>> is far from a reality.       >>>>>       >>>>> Barring a transformation of human beings to angels, there will       >>>>> never be disarmament. Well, if our whole civilization collapses       >>>>> there'll be nuclear disarmament, but that's a cure worse than the       >>>>> disease.       >>>>>       >>>>> That said, there's a hell of a lot fewer nukes in the world now       >>>>> than there were when I was younger. DRASTICALLY fewer (and most, if       >>>>> not all, of those currently credited to Russia or other former       >>>>> Soviet states are, in all likelihood, actually nothing but       >>>>> annoyingly radioactive lumps. It takes a lot of picky maintenance       >>>>> to make sure a nuke will do its thing when fired).       >>>>>       >>>>> I'm not particularly afraid of nukes. No one's used them since       >>>>> we did, in the most completely conclusive demonstration of "why you       >>>>> don't want to continue this war" ever staged. I don't expect to see       >>>>> them used again, except possibly by terrorists (who aren't likely       >>>>> to succeed anyway because they don't generally have the technical       >>>>> competence necessary).       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>> G00gle "dirty bomb" sometime to understand the risk of having       >>>> unsupervised nuke material laying about, eh?       >>>       >>> No worse than any other toxic material, and requires technical       >>> competence (though not quite as much) to assemble and deploy with       >>> reasonable safety.       >>>       >>> If you're not very careful, your people also become       >>> easily-followed beacons.       >>>       >>       >> So its the perfect weapon to be deployed by suicidal fundamentalists.       >>       >>       >       > Gods, no. There's a lot better weapons if you really want to do DAMAGE.       >       ZOMGS! why are you helping teh terraists!?!?              --       www.skepticalscience.com|www.youtube.com/officialpeta       cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org        _____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____        / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\        _\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\        /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca