Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.manga    |    All aspects of the Japanese storytelling    |    7,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,970 of 7,759    |
|    Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) to All    |
|    Re: M. Night Shyamalan directs... POKEMO    |
|    17 Aug 10 22:11:08    |
      XPost: alt.fan.furry, rec.arts.anime.misc       From: seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com              §ñühw¤£f wrote:       > Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:       >> §ñühw¤£f wrote:       >>> Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:       >>>> §ñühw¤£f wrote:       >>>>> Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote:       >>>>>> B Sellers wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> We finished off the Cold War but so far Nuclear Disarmament       >>>>>>> is far from a reality.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Barring a transformation of human beings to angels, there will       >>>>>> never be disarmament. Well, if our whole civilization collapses       >>>>>> there'll be nuclear disarmament, but that's a cure worse than the       >>>>>> disease.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> That said, there's a hell of a lot fewer nukes in the world       >>>>>> now than there were when I was younger. DRASTICALLY fewer (and       >>>>>> most, if not all, of those currently credited to Russia or other       >>>>>> former Soviet states are, in all likelihood, actually nothing but       >>>>>> annoyingly radioactive lumps. It takes a lot of picky maintenance       >>>>>> to make sure a nuke will do its thing when fired).       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I'm not particularly afraid of nukes. No one's used them since       >>>>>> we did, in the most completely conclusive demonstration of "why       >>>>>> you don't want to continue this war" ever staged. I don't expect       >>>>>> to see them used again, except possibly by terrorists (who aren't       >>>>>> likely to succeed anyway because they don't generally have the       >>>>>> technical competence necessary).       >>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> G00gle "dirty bomb" sometime to understand the risk of having       >>>>> unsupervised nuke material laying about, eh?       >>>>       >>>> No worse than any other toxic material, and requires technical       >>>> competence (though not quite as much) to assemble and deploy with       >>>> reasonable safety.       >>>>       >>>> If you're not very careful, your people also become       >>>> easily-followed beacons.       >>>>       >>>       >>> So its the perfect weapon to be deployed by suicidal fundamentalists.       >>>       >>>       >>       >> Gods, no. There's a lot better weapons if you really want to do       >> DAMAGE.       >>       > ZOMGS! why are you helping teh terraists!?!?       >               If the terrorists are on Usenet, they have already lost.              --        Sea Wasp        /^\        ;;;         Live Journal: http://seawasp.livejournal.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca