XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
      
   In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >   
   >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get   
   yourself   
   >>>>>>>>>> > into.  You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech   
   support.   
   >>>>>>>>>> > :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check?  If so, you?re going to have to wait until   
   I   
   >>>>>>>>> can cash it.  If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to   
   the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant.  Since it looks fine to everyone but you,   
   >>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Rean the RFC.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> OK.  Your reception is non-compliant.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Bile spewing idiot.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face   
   >>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see   
   >>those characters as a single quote?   
   >>   
   >   
   > Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?   
      
   Only one to notice.   
      
   Only one to make the effort to comment.   
      
   A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
      
   >>   
   >>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?   
   >>   
   >   
   > Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or   
   > doesn't).  You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the   
   > problem must be at his end.  Typical of you.  Jim is never wrong; it's   
   > always the other guy.   
      
   And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on   
   about it.   
      
   >   
   > Why did you bring it up?   
      
   Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.   
      
      
   --   
   Jim Pennino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)