XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
      
   In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >   
   >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get   
   yourself   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> > into.  You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech   
   support.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check?  If so, you?re going to have to wait   
   until I   
   >>>>>>>>>>> can cash it.  If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to   
   the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant.  Since it looks fine to everyone but you,   
   >>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> OK.  Your reception is non-compliant.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face   
   >>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see   
   >>>>those characters as a single quote?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Only one to notice.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.   
   > Nobody else sees it, Jim.  It's just YOU.   
      
   And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be   
   able to read minds now?   
      
   >>   
   >>Only one to make the effort to comment.   
   >>   
   >   
   > And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it?  Why   
   > do they all hate you so, Jim?   
      
   "caterwauling"?   
      
   If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   about something that has nothing to do with you.   
      
   >>   
   >>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Really?  On what planet?   
      
   All of them.   
      
      
   > Let me help you out.  "This meat is overcooked."  Assuming the meat   
   > actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact.  It's also a   
   > complaint about the state of the meat.   
      
   Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.   
      
   > Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".   
      
   A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
      
   >>>>   
   >>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or   
   >>> doesn't).  You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the   
   >>> problem must be at his end.  Typical of you.  Jim is never wrong; it's   
   >>> always the other guy.   
   >>   
   >>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on   
   >>about it.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Why did you bring it up?   
   >>   
   >>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.   
      
   You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something   
   that has absolutely nothing to do with you.   
      
   If anyone is caterwauling it is you.   
      
      
   --   
   Jim Pennino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)