XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
   From: fjmccall@gmail.com   
      
   jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
      
   >In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get   
   yourself   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into.  You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech   
   support.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check?  If so, you?re going to have to wait   
   until I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it.  If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere   
   to the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant.  Since it looks fine to everyone but   
   you,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> OK.  Your reception is non-compliant.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face   
   >>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see   
   >>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Only one to notice.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.   
   >>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim.  It's just YOU.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be   
   >>>able to read minds now?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to   
   >> argue.  Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my   
   >> asking you why you were the only one complaining.  I agreed with your   
   >> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll?  When did YOU   
   >> run a poll, dipshit?   
   >   
   >What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.   
   >   
      
   You're stuck again, chimp.  YOU said what you are complaining that *I*   
   said.  See above, where your answer to why you are the only one   
   complaining is that you are "the only one to notice".  In other words,   
   nobody else saw it.   
      
   >   
   >Look two sentences above your lie.   
   >   
      
   Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".   
      
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it?  Why   
   >>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>"caterwauling"?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Look it up.  I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in   
   >> future so that perhaps you can follow along.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   >>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking   
   >> them?  Just a thought.   
   >>   
   >   
   >If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   >about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >   
      
   You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp.  Your wailing   
   makes it everyone's business.   
      
   >>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Really?  On what planet?   
   >>>   
   >>>All of them.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Bullshit.  Are you stupid or are you a liar?   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Let me help you out.  "This meat is overcooked."  Assuming the meat   
   >>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact.  It's also a   
   >>>> complaint about the state of the meat.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.   
   >> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp?  Here on Earth where   
   >> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is   
   >> unsatisfactory".  You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.   
   >>   
   >>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".   
   >>>   
   >>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You're stupid.  You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.   
   >   
   >Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.   
   >   
      
   Where did you get that from?  Wow, you are just delusional.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or   
   >>>>>> doesn't).  You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the   
   >>>>>> problem must be at his end.  Typical of you.  Jim is never wrong; it's   
   >>>>>> always the other guy.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on   
   >>>>>about it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Why did you bring it up?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.   
   >>>   
   >>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something   
   >>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to   
   >> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual   
   >> 'solution' to things).  So why are you still wanking on about it?   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, Chimp.  It's always someone else and never you...   
   >>   
   >   
   >You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something   
   >that has absolutely nothing to do with you.   
   >   
      
   I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)