XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
      
   In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >   
   >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get   
   yourself   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into.  You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech   
   support.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check?  If so, you?re going to have to wait   
   until I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it.  If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere   
   to the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant.  Since it looks fine to everyone but   
   you,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> OK.  Your reception is non-compliant.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face   
   >>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see   
   >>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Only one to notice.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.   
   >>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim.  It's just YOU.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be   
   >>>>able to read minds now?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to   
   >>> argue.  Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my   
   >>> asking you why you were the only one complaining.  I agreed with your   
   >>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll?  When did YOU   
   >>> run a poll, dipshit?   
   >>   
   >>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.   
   >>   
   >   
   > You're stuck again, chimp.  YOU said what you are complaining that *I*   
   > said.   
      
   In English please.   
      
   > See above, where your answer to why you are the only one   
   > complaining is that you are "the only one to notice".  In other words,   
   > nobody else saw it.   
      
   YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.   
      
   You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.   
      
   >>   
   >>Look two sentences above your lie.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".   
      
   Look at the list where that is one of many.   
      
   >   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it?  Why   
   >>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"caterwauling"?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Look it up.  I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in   
   >>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   >>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking   
   >>> them?  Just a thought.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   >>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>   
   >   
   > You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp.  Your wailing   
   > makes it everyone's business.   
      
   I am responding whatever YOU posted to.   
      
   If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.   
      
   >>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Really?  On what planet?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>All of them.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Bullshit.  Are you stupid or are you a liar?   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Let me help you out.  "This meat is overcooked."  Assuming the meat   
   >>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact.  It's also a   
   >>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.   
   >>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp?  Here on Earth where   
   >>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is   
   >>> unsatisfactory".  You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".   
   >>>>   
   >>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> You're stupid.  You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.   
   >>   
   >>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Where did you get that from?   
      
   From YOUR diatribe on the subject.   
      
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or   
   >>>>>>> doesn't).  You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the   
   >>>>>>> problem must be at his end.  Typical of you.  Jim is never wrong; it's   
   >>>>>>> always the other guy.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on   
   >>>>>>about it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why did you bring it up?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something   
   >>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)