Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,045 of 45,986    |
|    Andrew Etter to All    |
|    Casaba-Howitzer-pumped Laser?    |
|    15 Apr 16 22:30:20    |
      From: andrewbetter@gmail.com              Hello again,       So I was running some more spreadsheets on the feasibility of various space       weapons (standard lasers, bomb-pumped lasers, Casaba Howitzers), working from       some real world nuclear warhead and reactor numbers and the efficiency       estimates and equations from        Atomic Rockets.              I seem to have run across a useful idea, although I'm not sure, so I wanted to       ask about it here. I found that a Casaba-Howitzer, though massively powerful,       seemed to be significantly less effective than a nuke-pumped laser with the       same kiloton charge.         I also realized that most of the issue with the bomb-pumped laser is that the       energy is divided among 50 or so rods pointed in all directions. So I       figured, what if a Casaba-Howitzer pumps the laser instead? Assuming my       calculations are correct, the        Casaba-Howitzer cone is about 0.25% square degrees of a sphere, which means       that if an omnidirectional nuke-pumped laser has 50 rods, a Casa       a-Howitzer-pumped laser would focus the energy into a single rod (actually       one-eighth). Even assuming 50% shaped        charge efficiency, this results in a laser that applies about 30 times more       energy for a given kiloton yield than a traditional nuke-pumped laser.              This basically results in a ridiculously powerful missile warhead. For       example, if we use a 75000-kiloton warhead (large, but bear with me), assuming       80% laser rod efficiency and a beam divergence of 20 microradians, this       results in a beam that applies        about 25kJ/cm^2 over a circle 4000m in diameter at a range of 200,000km. This       means that if the target ship has a max acceleration of 10Gs (about max human       tolerance), and it takes 0.67sec for missile's sensors to receive data from       the enemy warship due        to lightspeed, 0.5sec for the missile to aim and fire, and 0.67sec for the       laser to arrive--the enemy ship could only displace 200m from its predicted       position 2secs ago when the missile's input dates from. And since the laser       circle is 4000m in        diameter, there is no way the enemy ship could evade. Plus, at this kind of       range, it'd be quite difficult for the ship to destroy the missile with its       own lasers.              In other words, given a fairly large kiloton yield, there could be no defense       against missiles fitted with this type of warhead, besides interceptor       missiles.              So I was kind of wondering--       Does this make sense? Is this a legitimate possibility? Are my calculations       correct? I kind of figure someone would have thought of this already, so I       was curious since I hadn't really seen anything that would suggest this       possibility.              Thanks.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca