XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
   From: fjmccall@gmail.com   
      
   jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
      
   >In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you   
   get yourself   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into.  You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your   
   tech support.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check?  If so, you?re going to have to   
   wait until I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it.  If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't   
   adhere to the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant.  Since it looks fine to everyone but   
   you,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> OK.  Your reception is non-compliant.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face   
   >>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that   
   see   
   >>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Only one to notice.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.   
   >>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim.  It's just YOU.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be   
   >>>>>able to read minds now?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to   
   >>>> argue.  Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my   
   >>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining.  I agreed with your   
   >>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll?  When did YOU   
   >>>> run a poll, dipshit?   
   >>>   
   >>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You're stuck again, chimp.  YOU said what you are complaining that *I*   
   >> said.   
   >   
   >In English please.   
   >   
      
   That is English.  I'm sorry, are the words to big for you?   
      
   >> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one   
   >> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice".  In other words,   
   >> nobody else saw it.   
   >   
   >YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.   
   >   
      
   And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you.   
      
   >   
   >You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.   
   >   
      
   And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up   
   its ass.   
      
   >>>   
   >>>Look two sentences above your lie.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".   
   >   
   >Look at the list where that is one of many.   
   >   
      
   Irrelevant.  You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING   
   with you.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it?  Why   
   >>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>"caterwauling"?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Look it up.  I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in   
   >>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   >>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking   
   >>>> them?  Just a thought.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   >>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp.  Your wailing   
   >> makes it everyone's business.   
   >>   
   >   
   >I am responding whatever YOU posted to.   
   >   
      
   Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp.   
      
   >   
   >If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.   
   >   
      
   Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp.  Why did you post this to ANY   
   newsgroup in the first place?   
      
   >>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Really?  On what planet?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>All of them.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Bullshit.  Are you stupid or are you a liar?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Let me help you out.  "This meat is overcooked."  Assuming the meat   
   >>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact.  It's also a   
   >>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.   
   >>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp?  Here on Earth where   
   >>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is   
   >>>> unsatisfactory".  You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You're stupid.  You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.   
   >>>   
   >>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Where did you get that from?   
   >>   
   >   
   >From YOUR diatribe on the subject.   
   >   
      
   And once again we see that Chimp Just Can't Read.  YOU complained in a   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)