XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you
get yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your
tech support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to
wait until I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't
adhere to the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone
but you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the
face
>>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that
see
>>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Only one to notice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.
>>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be
>>>>>>able to read minds now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to
>>>>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my
>>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your
>>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU
>>>>> run a poll, dipshit?
>>>>
>>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I*
>>> said.
>>
>>In English please.
>>
>
> That is English. I'm sorry, are the words to big for you?
>
>>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one
>>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words,
>>> nobody else saw it.
>>
>>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.
>>
>
> And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you.
>
>>
>>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.
>>
>
> And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up
> its ass.
>
>>>>
>>>>Look two sentences above your lie.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".
>>
>>Look at the list where that is one of many.
>>
>
> Irrelevant. You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING
> with you.
>
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why
>>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"caterwauling"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in
>>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking
>>>>> them? Just a thought.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on
>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing
>>> makes it everyone's business.
>>>
>>
>>I am responding whatever YOU posted to.
>>
>
> Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp.
>
>>
>>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.
>>
>
> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you post this to ANY
> newsgroup in the first place?
>
>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really? On what planet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>All of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat
>>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a
>>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'.
>>>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where
>>>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is
>>>>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue.
>>>>
>>>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint.
>>>>
>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
