XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
      
   In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >   
   >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you   
   get yourself   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into.  You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your   
   tech support.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check?  If so, you?re going to have to   
   wait until I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it.  If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't   
   adhere to the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant.  Since it looks fine to everyone   
   but you,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.  Your reception is non-compliant.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the   
   face   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people   
   that see   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Only one to notice.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it.   
   >>>>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim.  It's just YOU.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be   
   >>>>>>>>able to read minds now?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to   
   >>>>>>> argue.  Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my   
   >>>>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining.  I agreed with your   
   >>>>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll?  When did YOU   
   >>>>>>> run a poll, dipshit?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You're stuck again, chimp.  YOU said what you are complaining that *I*   
   >>>>> said.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>In English please.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> That is English.  I'm sorry, are the words to big for you?   
   >>>   
   >>>>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one   
   >>>>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice".  In other words,   
   >>>>> nobody else saw it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up   
   >>> its ass.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Look two sentences above your lie.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Look at the list where that is one of many.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Irrelevant.  You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING   
   >>> with you.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it?  Why   
   >>>>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>"caterwauling"?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Look it up.  I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in   
   >>>>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and   
   on   
   >>>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking   
   >>>>>>> them?  Just a thought.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on   
   >>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp.  Your wailing   
   >>>>> makes it everyone's business.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I am responding whatever YOU posted to.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp.  Why did you post this to ANY   
   >>> newsgroup in the first place?   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Really?  On what planet?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>All of them.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Bullshit.  Are you stupid or are you a liar?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Let me help you out.  "This meat is overcooked."  Assuming the meat   
   >>>>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact.  It's also a   
   >>>>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)