home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.science      Real and speculative aspects of SF scien      45,986 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 44,073 of 45,986   
   Fred J. McCall to jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com   
   Re: The European Space Agency just unvei   
   16 Apr 16 12:54:35   
   
   XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
   From: fjmccall@gmail.com   
      
   jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
      
   >In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes   
   you get yourself   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into.  You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your   
   tech support.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped]   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check?  If so, you?re going to have to   
   wait until I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it.  If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't   
   adhere to the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant.  Since it looks fine to everyone   
   but you,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK.  Your reception is non-compliant.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the   
   face   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people   
   that see   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Only one to notice.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about   
   it.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim.  It's just YOU.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be   
   >>>>>>>>>able to read minds now?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to   
   >>>>>>>> argue.  Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my   
   >>>>>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining.  I agreed with your   
   >>>>>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll?  When did YOU   
   >>>>>>>> run a poll, dipshit?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You're stuck again, chimp.  YOU said what you are complaining that *I*   
   >>>>>> said.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>In English please.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That is English.  I'm sorry, are the words to big for you?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one   
   >>>>>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice".  In other words,   
   >>>>>> nobody else saw it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up   
   >>>> its ass.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Look two sentences above your lie.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Look at the list where that is one of many.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Irrelevant.  You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING   
   >>>> with you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it?    
   Why   
   >>>>>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>"caterwauling"?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Look it up.  I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in   
   >>>>>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on   
   and on   
   >>>>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking   
   >>>>>>>> them?  Just a thought.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and   
   on   
   >>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp.  Your wailing   
   >>>>>> makes it everyone's business.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I am responding whatever YOU posted to.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp.  Why did you post this to ANY   
   >>>> newsgroup in the first place?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Really?  On what planet?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>All of them.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Bullshit.  Are you stupid or are you a liar?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Let me help you out.  "This meat is overcooked."  Assuming the meat   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca