Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,108 of 45,986    |
|    Mikkel Haaheim to All    |
|    Re: The European Space Agency just unvei    |
|    26 Apr 16 00:05:16    |
      From: mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com              Thomas,       Not exactly what I was talking about, no. However, this DOES illustrate how       robots can be continually readapted for troubling tasks, whereas humans can       not. Is this suitable for maintenance work? Well, that depends upon what that       maintenance is. If you        are talking about routine inspection and maintenance of small assemblies, then       no, there ar other robots more suitable for that kind of work. However, if you       are talking about cutting through, lifting, and removing heavy tsunami debris,       then yes. If you        are talking about removing heavy nuclear fuel rods and encapsulating them,       then removing the shielded containers weighing several tonnes, then yes. If       you are talking about entering a reactor that is still highly active, with       fuel that is still under        constant interaction, with a tremendously high neutron flux... Well, we hope       so. Entering the reactor is instant death for any human, and even most robots       have not lasted long, although they HAVE survived a measurable amount of time,       unlike humans.       No, what I was mostly talking about was the assortment of robots designed for       more routine work. This includes inspection of the reactors and reactor pools,       removal and transfer of spent fuel rods from innert (but still highly       radioactive) reactors,        loading fresh fuel rods, routine maintenance, removal, and repair/replacement       of small and large components of the reactor, piping, pump machinery, heat       exchangers, cooling towers, etc. Most of the robots working in the reactors       themselves are        essentially robotic subs that swim to the sections requiring inspection or       repair. Like ALL mini subs, they require some type of crane to lower them into       the reactor pool, but once in the pool they manoeuvre on their own, although       most often with an        umbilical to ensure long term power and reliable communications in the       radioactive environment (although even these normally are fitted with backup       battery reserves and radio communications). Some ar very small, and therefore       limited in the manipulations        they can perform... But this is in order to inspect piping from the inside,       doing minor patchwork as necessary without having to disassemble the piping.       Some of these can do their work even while the reactor is still online.       Robots are optimised for the environments they are meant to perform in, and       for the tasks they are meant to perform. Yes, most of these robots are remote       controlled. This is because it is cheaper to have them operated by humans than       it is to programme        them. The decision to do so is financial, and NOT reflective of the actual       capabilities of the robotics industry. If you require robots to act       independently of humans to perform tasks, these are available, and their       abilities are expanding exponentially.        BTW: the crane in the video is actually part of the robot... thus, you are not       using a crane to lower the robot, the robot is using its built in crane to       lower the manipulator assembly.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca