Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,138 of 45,986    |
|    Alien8752@gmail.com to Mikkel Haaheim    |
|    Re: Rotational Momentum, Astronaut Orien    |
|    10 Jun 16 13:53:48    |
      From: nuny@bid.nes              On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:18:30 PM UTC-7, Mikkel Haaheim wrote:       > Sorry, I don't know of any on line calculators off hand. For what you want, I       > think you need a fairly long but narrow corridor, with a 1 m hole at one end       > of the corridor. The astronaut should be closer towards the end with the       > hole. This way, the hole is large enough for a semi-explosive decompression,       > the length of the corridor provides a large supply of air to push the       > astronaut, and to keep the outgassing going enough for momentum to build up.               Yes. The idea is a stiff wind, not a bullet in a gun barrel.              > The narrowness of the corridor will allow her to block a fair amount of that       > air so it is more difficult to simply blow past her without imparting some       > momentum on her. The hard part will be explaining why there is such a long       > stretch of corridor without sealed bulkheads.               Depends on how the ship/station is arranged. Large workspaces or storage       areas, that can't be partitioned off into smaller volumes, are occasionally       necessary.              > Rough estimate: the width of the coridor should be no more than 1.5 m, and       > the deck height no more than 1.8 m to 2 m. The length behind her should be at       > least 100 m... Shorter if it is branches off to lateral corridors in the       > section behind her, or if the coridor opens into a large chamber...       > Essentially, you want to funnel'a large volum'of air behind her, and have her       > act as a kind of blockage to that funnel. You want her to be about 5 m or so       > from the hole, giving the air time to act on her body. Again, you have to       > explain the lack of bulkhead doors. Perhaps borrow a page from the Titanic:       > no one thought anything would be able to penetrate the extremely thick hull,       > so they figured that partitioning would be too costly of an unnecessary       > expense.               Or, whatever causes the breach tweaks the spaceframe such that the airtight       bulkheads can't actuate.               Or, she's near a "man door" (personnel-only hatch)in the outer bulkhead of a       large cargo space; many cubic meters of air behind her and a small vent to       concentrate the airflow.               Why it's a single hatch and not a double-door airlock, and getting the hatch       to fail would be the issues there.               Not having an airlock in any case is an issue, unless it's say a station       that's meant to be added on to periodically, and the hatch was intended to       connect to another section that isn't there yet.              > Keep in mind, I am not doing the calculations here. This is not even back of       > the envelope... But it should give you a rough idea of the kind of situation       > you need.               I concur.               Also, it's usually best not to go into too much detail. What you wrote about       a long corridor is sufficient for any story purpose.                      Mark L. Fergerson              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca