Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,156 of 45,986    |
|    Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) to Patrick Janecke    |
|    Re: Ideas for Space to Surface weapons    |
|    21 Jun 16 07:54:17    |
      From: seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com              On 6/21/16 1:33 AM, Patrick Janecke wrote:       > The beauty of an orbital impactor is its simplicity. A large chunk of       tungsten bar-stock is about as simple as it gets. Massive destruction and no       moving parts.       >       > Once you decide to get fancy, you may as well air-burst some nukes.       >                      But it's very expensive and, if it's JUST tungsten bar-stock with no       guidance (which then needs some level of protection to function on the       way down, which makes it a LOT more expensive) then it has sucky       precision. Plus, if it's just tungsten bar stock, it can't decelerate,       which means you need some kind of station up in orbit to decelerate it       to re-entry speed and put it on-target.              --        Sea Wasp        /^\        ;;;        Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:       http://seawasp.livejournal.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca