Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,180 of 45,986    |
|    Mikkel Haaheim to All    |
|    Re: James S.A. Corey's answer to There A    |
|    20 Jul 16 10:37:25    |
      From: mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com              Le dimanche 26 juin 2016 18:54:03 UTC+2, Patrick Janecke a écrit :       > Excellent point. My biggest concern with even that form of stealth is that       there are bound to be far more sensor installations for prospecting for metal       (or possibly salvage) than military. How does a cold running battleship fend       off a swarm of hull-       cutting salvage drones and remain cold?              FUN!! ... But unlikely. For efficiency, the prospectors will be independent of       the miners (etc). Salvage is not particularly profitable, so the prospectors       will be targetting larger asteroids and other astronomical bodies first. Most       of these will        probably be rovers, dedicated to a single body until that body has been       completely surveyed. Also, you don't want to build so many surveyors       (prospectors) that the cost starts cutting into profits, so you will only       build as many as required to keep the        miners busy... and you will only build as many miners as necessary to keep up       with demand (plus a modest reserve for growth).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca