Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,205 of 45,986    |
|    Mikkel Haaheim to All    |
|    Re: Waterskiing spacecraft manevuering    |
|    23 Jul 16 12:41:33    |
      From: mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com              Le samedi 23 juillet 2016 06:13:19 UTC+2, nu...@bid.nes a écrit :              > Yes, but remember that the cables *stretch* as thrust is applied. Reduce       thrust to zero and the cables don't just hang slack, restoring force pulls the       towed module forward. Unless the cables are reeled in there's a clear risk of       fouling them.       >               That is true. Thinking about it, there would also be consequences with the       distribution of momentum between different masses. So, okay, I need to refine       my statement... reducing thrust is not a problem unless you reach a certain       threshold limit where        elastic tension starts to overwheml current thrust, or if you reduce thrust       too quickly while below that threshold (the issue should be largely resolved       if you allow time for the cables to return to original condition, and drift       will be less of a problem        if momentum is relativelt stable.              OTOH, spring recoil reels wouldn't hurt.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca