Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,255 of 45,986    |
|    Doc O'Leary to jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com    |
|    Re: Paper published on producing arbitra    |
|    24 Aug 16 16:25:10    |
      XPost: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy       From: droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com              For your reference, records indicate that       jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:              > The sole reason that flying cars have never been a commercial success       > is economics              No, it’s simply because they’re a stupid outdated SF concept birthed       from a car-crazed society. Once you have a vehicle that can fly between       locations, it makes zero sense to also make it suitable for driving on       roads. Who in their right mind is going to *drive* anywhere they could       just fly to? Who is going trust that a roadworthy vehicle after miles       of driving is going to remain airworthy?              Eliminate the “economics” problems and flying cars still make no sense.       Imagine a world where everyone is Superman. Superman does not drive to       the rescue. Only motorheads ever thought flying cars were a good idea.              --       "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain."       River Tam, Trash, Firefly              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca