Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,326 of 45,986    |
|    elie.thorne@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: James S.A. Corey's answer to There A    |
|    21 Sep 16 09:50:46    |
      >So far, H2 is still superior... but at this point, heat capacity becomes a       disadvantage, as it takes 7x the amount of energy to heat gaseous H2 as it       does to heat water vapour.              I am not sure how this is a disadvantage. Given that the ship has weeks,       months or even years of coast time, low acceleration is not a problem: small,       constant acceleration is about as good as high point acceleration, as seen       with probes using ion drives.       In specific short-duration missions, or on the outer reaches of the system       where solar-thermal simply don't have enough energy, higher thrust may be       needed for the entire course, though. Maybe Kuiper Belt models would use water       for that reason. They        might still keep liquid hydrogen to cool the hull down, though.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca