Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,327 of 45,986    |
|    elie.thorne@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: James S.A. Corey's answer to There A    |
|    21 Sep 16 09:31:43    |
      Side notes:              Having no nuclear power, it will not be detected by neutrino detectors.              On the other hand, I have no idea how feasible a long-range gravimetric       detector is, and at which point it can detected all ship-sized objects in the       solar system (and track them to see if one is not following its orbit as it       should). I've vaguely heard        about prototype gravimetric devices used to detect masses across a wall       (useful for disaster relief or SWAT teams), but I doubt their range can easily       be extended to interplanetary range.       In the far enough future, this may limit this design to smaller crafts, with       lower autonomy.              Active systems like radar or lidar could be used to detect those, but       technologies like featureless shapes and radar-absorbent material are already       available to counter those.              I am not sure how much more complex it would become to adapt it to multiple       star systems. Good luck if your system has four stars.              Getting rid of warm-blooded human crew would extend autonomy, but not that       significantly: the most energy you have to get rid of comes from the Sun. The       biggest contributor may be by allowing a smaller cross-section.       That is, until you start operating in the Kuiper Belt or the Oort Cloud.              The further you are from the Sun, the lower your acceleration and the higher       your autonomy.              Close enough from the Sun and the disk is big enough to be a problem: the ship       needs to be cone-shaped to keep in the shadow of its solar-thermal engine, and       at some point the cone will be too short to be practical. (Not much of the       black surface can        reasonably be lit by the Sun.)       But at that point, your autonomy may be too low anyway.              If you are even closer to the Sun (as in, right above its atmosphere, you are       better off just putting a mirror on its side: it's not as if the Other Side(s)       would put outward-pointing sensors even lower, right?       Right?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca