Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,331 of 45,986    |
|    Mikkel Haaheim to All    |
|    Re: James S.A. Corey's answer to There A    |
|    21 Sep 16 23:37:18    |
      From: mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com              Le mercredi 21 septembre 2016 18:31:46 UTC+2, elie....@gmail.com a écrit :              > On the other hand, I have no idea how feasible a long-range gravimetric       detector is, and at which point it can detected all ship-sized objects in the       solar system (and track them to see if one is not following its orbit as it       should). I've vaguely        heard about prototype gravimetric devices used to detect masses across a wall       (useful for disaster relief or SWAT teams), but I doubt their range can easily       be extended to interplanetary range.       > In the far enough future, this may limit this design to smaller crafts, with       lower autonomy.              Negligent. Gravity is a fairly weak force, and the mass of even a relatively       large vessel would likely be virtually undetectable at much more than a few       meters, regardless of sensitivity. The masses of planets even thousands of       light seconds away would        interfere with any sensitive gravimetric readings.              >        > Active systems like radar or lidar could be used to detect those, but       technologies like featureless shapes and radar-absorbent material are already       available to counter those.              Distance would render radar and lidar pretty useless at distances much over       100 000 km, unless you are using a 35m radar dish with a multi-MW transmitter       source... something you would not be able to fit on any non-dedicated       platform. Even then, the        return signal might be questionable with stealth tech.              >        > I am not sure how much more complex it would become to adapt it to multiple       star systems. Good luck if your system has four stars.              Last I heard, a system with four stars would most likely have rendered any       additional mass into dust... thus, virtually no resources worth defending, and       virtually no possibility for life to evolve. Even visiting life forms would       probably find it        difficult to survive in such a system for more than a few days.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca