Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,356 of 45,986    |
|    Alien8752@gmail.com to Mikkel Haaheim    |
|    Re: James S.A. Corey's answer to There A    |
|    04 Oct 16 14:29:44    |
      From: nuny@bid.nes              On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 7:25:08 AM UTC-7, Mikkel Haaheim wrote:              (snip)              > BTW: another option, which also decreases efficiency a little, is to curve       > the radiator concavely.               If by that you mean to reduce the emission angle by making the radiating       surface concave, that won't work for two reasons.               First, every point on the radiating surface is radiating in all directions.       Curving the radiator just effectively reduces the radiating surface area as       seen by distant, heat-absorbing space. It does not reduce total emission angle.               Second, you now have all points on the radiating surface "looking at" other       points on the radiating surface reducing their ability to lose heat. Heat       emitted by any point that impacts those other points is reabsorbed and has to       be re-emitted, raising        the temperature of the whole emitting surface. While that helps radiativity       because heat flows better from a hotter radiator to cold space, it becomes a       choke point for heat flow.               To see my point better, continue curving the radiator into a long, skinny       paraboloid. Its open end still emits heat into a half-sphere of space, but       from a distance it's become a small, hot circle.               (This also increases the load on the insulation for the cold side of the       radiator.)               Both of my objections become moot if you can come up with a material that       only emits heat perpendicularly (or at any controllable angle) to the emitting       surface with e. g. some metamaterials trick, but I'm not suspending my       disbelief from that without        at least one current technology "laboratory curiosity" example. With such       materials a radiator can be flat or any shape dictated by available places to       hang it on the spaceframe. Another limitation- such technologies are typically       limited to a narrow        band of wavelengths while heat is by definition wideband.               Speaking of metamaterials, I've read of some that can turn heat into light a       la the unphysical "cooling lasers" found in some SF, but they're still subject       to thermodynamics; they generate more waste heat than they emit.                      Mark L. Fergerson              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca