XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics   
      
   In sci.physics Fred J. McCall  wrote:   
   > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >   
   >>In sci.physics Alain Fournier  wrote:   
   >>> On Oct/11/2016 at 8:19 PM, Serigo wrote :   
   >>>> On 10/11/2016 6:10 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:   
   >>>>> In article , invalid@invalid.com says...   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> no food, no water, no air.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There is a bit of water on Mars (e.g. polar regions)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> conjecture, not proven and so little, unusable.   
   >>>   
   >>> Well, let's say it is a very strong conjecture.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> and again a CO2   
   >>>>> atmosphere.  Food could be grown.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> all moisture would leave the plant.   
   >>>> Not enough CO2 or atmosphereic pressure to support any plants.   
   >>>> Radiation will kill it off in a few years.   
   >>>   
   >>> You would do so in pressurized greenhouses. It can be done.   
   >>   
   >>Just because something can be done does not mean it should be done.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Just because you're lazy and against manned space flight doesn't mean   
   > it shouldn't be done.   
      
   Still a troll ass hole, I see.   
      
   plonk again as it must have expired.   
      
      
   --   
   Jim Pennino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)