XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics   
   From: invalid@invalid.com   
      
   On 10/12/2016 3:16 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   > Serigo  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 10/11/2016 10:50 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   >>> Alain Fournier  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Oct/11/2016 at 8:19 PM, Serigo wrote :   
   >>>>> On 10/11/2016 6:10 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:   
   >>>>>> In article , invalid@invalid.com says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> no food, no water, no air.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There is a bit of water on Mars (e.g. polar regions)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> conjecture, not proven and so little, unusable.   
      
   >>>> Well, let's say it is a very strong conjecture.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> It's not conjecture.  It's a fact.  Water has been detected and in   
   >>> other places than the poles.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> NASA says it is conjecture.   
   >>   
      
   > Read something newer than half a century old.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Go read the orgional reports and studies.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Go read something current.  FLOWING SURFACE WATER is 'conjecture'. The   
   > presence of large quantities of water as ices and frozen brines is   
   > FACT.   
      
   wrong, it is only photos of a flowed surface, it is conjectured as water   
   flow, not verified.   
      
   try to keep up.   
      
   >   
   >>   
   >> you can not provide any URLS to support your assertions.   
   >>   
   >   
   > I certainly can't list all the hits googling "water Mars" produces.   
      
   no need, find the one to the orgional NASA report that conjecturs it   
   must be water.   
      
   ALL the rest of the articals come from that one.   
      
      
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)