home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.science      Real and speculative aspects of SF scien      45,986 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 44,442 of 45,986   
   jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com to Moore"   
   Re: A smaller, faster version of the Spa   
   14 Oct 16 02:51:03   
   
   XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics   
      
   In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore"  wrote:   
   > wrote in message news:s5k5dd-cab.ln1@mail.specsol.com...   
   >>   
   >>In sci.physics "Greg \(Strider\) Moore"    
   >>wrote:   
   >>> "Serigo"  wrote in message news:nto0qi$k69$1@gioia.aioe.org...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>On 10/12/2016 11:18 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   >>>>> Wrong.  I seem to know a lot more about this (and everything) than you   
   >>>>> do, troll.  For any reasonable amount you can produce as much as you   
   >>>>> want.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> >   
   >>>>>> >If you?re looking for a rough estimate rather than an entirely   
   >>>>>> >accurate   
   >>>>>> >one; a hundred cubic foot of gas is between 2 and 3 kWh, depending   
   >>>>>> >upon   
   >>>>>> >the conversion factors which are used.   
   >>>>>> >   
   >>>>> I'm the one who was looking for an 'estimate'.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>try reading;   
   >>>>   
   >>>>can YOU generate 1 ton of poop to power your computer for a day ?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>no!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>How much biogas can I get out of my waste?   
   >>>   
   >>> First of all, what's this fascination with methane for powering your   
   >>> computer?  You've got abundant solar and battery power.   
   >>   
   >>Nope, you've got about 40 W/m^2 of electrical power averaged over   
   >>a day available.   
   >   
   > Umm, why do you say "nope" when you then agree with me?   
      
   Because you said "abundant solar". There is solar power available but   
   I would hardly call it "abundant".   
      
   > It's not like we're constrained on how much space we are going to spread out   
   > our solar panels over. No neighbors are going to complain.   
      
   Yeah, sure it would be possible to cover half of Mars with solar   
   panels and get lots of power but that is not practical nor economical.   
      
   To get the energy of a little 50 MW reactor you need well over a million   
   square meters of solar panels that only work during daylight.   
      
   >>You do know Mars is farther from the Sun than the Earth?   
   >   
   > Yes.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>> The reason you want methane, if at all is for a launch vehicle. In that   
   >>> case, either bring your H2 with you and crack CO2 and make methane (the   
   >>> most   
   >>> likely process planned on at this time, or a bit harder capture the   
   >>> moisture   
   >>> you can, crack that and the CO2 and make methane. Or, very intriguing, if   
   >>> you can confirm there's methane already there (and there's some evidence)   
   >>> use that.)   
   >>   
   >>Sure, all it takes is lots of energy.   
   >>   
   >>It is possible to synthesize all the products obtained from crude oil,   
   >>yet the Middle East is still pumping.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Yes, because that's cheaper and simpler, on Earth. For now.   
      
      
   --   
   Jim Pennino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca