XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics   
      
   In sci.physics Serigo  wrote:   
   > On 10/15/2016 4:27 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however   
   >>> that is not going to be cheap.   
   >>>   
   >   
   >> I think it's funny that someone had to suggest this before you thought   
   >> of it and moved from 'impossible' to 'expensive'.  I think it's even   
   >> funnier that you said it to me and I stupidly have your head up my   
   >> ass to keep from seeing it.   
   >   
   >     no one cares what you think, troll.   
      
   Notice that the lying troll says I said "impossible" when I never   
   used that word.   
      
   >> You only need enough reactors to get you started producing solar cells   
   >> from in situ resources.  And it's no more 'expensive' than shipping   
   >> anything else to Mars.   
   >   
   > bullshit.   
   >   
   > you gloss over the required complexity so fast, you must be stoned as   
   > shit. or a lying shit.   
      
   He also glosses over the fact that you only get an average of about   
   40 W/m^2 of solar electricity on the surface of Mars.   
      
      
   --   
   Jim Pennino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)