XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics   
   From: invalid@invalid.com   
      
   On 10/15/2016 11:10 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   > Serigo  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 10/15/2016 4:27 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however   
   >>>> that is not going to be cheap.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I think it's funny that someone had to suggest this before you thought   
   >>> of it and moved from 'impossible' to 'expensive'.  I think it's even   
   >>> funnier that you said it to me and I stupidly have your head up my   
   >>> ass to keep from seeing it.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>     no one cares what you think, troll.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Yet here you are,   
      
   a thought !    wait,  never mind,  he's still spewing gibberish.   
      
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> You only need enough reactors to get you started producing solar cells   
   >>> from in situ resources.  And it's no more 'expensive' than shipping   
   >>> anything else to Mars.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> bullshit.   
   >>   
   >> you gloss over the required complexity so fast, you must be stoned as   
   >> shit. or a lying shit.   
   >>   
   >   
   > What 'complexity'?   
      
   figures,   
   you know that you are agreeing with me that you cannot comprehend the   
   complexity of the task or even a small part of it.   
      
      
   >   
   > And we know it's both, troll.  It's sad that people like you can't   
   > validate your self-importance in any other way.   
      
   you are projecting again   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)