Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,605 of 45,986    |
|    0something0 to All    |
|    FTL communications.    |
|    30 Oct 16 19:22:06    |
      From: sungjunnoh0802@gmail.com              I got it. You know since you can't actually control the outcome of the state       of a random quantum-entangled particle, FTL communications is not possible.               BUT... what if we made the particles have a measurement one by one at a set       time interval. lets say 1 second. But, if the entangled particle do not match       the state you were hoping to get, it waits a different interval before taking       more measurements(2        seconds in this example). So, it would be like this.                     Transmitter Log 12:00:00 05-03-2063(dd-mm-yy) Google Quantum Comms Center 1 @       Mountain View, CA, USA.       12:00:00 sent bit 0       12:00:01 sent bit 1       12:00:02 sent bit 0       12:00:03 sent bit 0-WARNING: BIT DID NOT MATCH DESIRED OUTCOME. WAITING 2       SECS(INSTEAD OF 1) BEFORE NEXT TRANSMISSION       12:00:05 sent bit 1              Receiver Log 12:00:00 05-03-2063(dd-mm-yy) SpaceX Quantum Comms Center 25 @       Watneyville, Arcadia Plentia, Mars.       12:00:00 received bit 0       12:00:01 received bit 1       12:00:02 received bit 0       12:00:03 received bit 0       12:00:05 received bit 1- +1 second difference from normal transmission       interval detected. Discarding previous bit.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca