From: eripe.dk@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 9:22:06 AM UTC+7, 0something0 wrote:   
   > I got it. You know since you can't actually control the outcome of the state   
   of a random quantum-entangled particle, FTL communications is not possible.    
   >    
   > BUT... what if we made the particles have a measurement one by one at a set   
   time interval. lets say 1 second. But, if the entangled particle do not match   
   the state you were hoping to get, it waits a different interval before taking   
   more measurements(2    
   seconds in this example). So, it would be like this.   
   >    
   >    
   > Transmitter Log 12:00:00 05-03-2063(dd-mm-yy) Google Quantum Comms Center 1   
   @ Mountain View, CA, USA.   
   > 12:00:00 sent bit 0   
   > 12:00:01 sent bit 1   
   > 12:00:02 sent bit 0   
   > 12:00:03 sent bit 0-WARNING: BIT DID NOT MATCH DESIRED OUTCOME. WAITING 2   
   SECS(INSTEAD OF 1) BEFORE NEXT TRANSMISSION   
   > 12:00:05 sent bit 1   
   >    
   > Receiver Log 12:00:00 05-03-2063(dd-mm-yy) SpaceX Quantum Comms Center 25 @   
   Watneyville, Arcadia Plentia, Mars.   
   > 12:00:00 received bit 0   
   > 12:00:01 received bit 1   
   > 12:00:02 received bit 0   
   > 12:00:03 received bit 0   
   > 12:00:05 received bit 1- +1 second difference from normal transmission   
   interval detected. Discarding previous bit.   
      
      
   The receiver does not recieve anything. He just has a box with entangled   
   waweforms/particles, and no way to tell if the sender has observed any of them.   
      
   e.g when he observes one, it collapses, and he does not know if it was already   
   collapsed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)