Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,700 of 45,986    |
|    Mikkel Haaheim to All    |
|    Re: Are there "Preferred" Trajectories?    |
|    09 Dec 16 11:39:49    |
      From: mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com              Le vendredi 11 novembre 2016 00:33:11 UTC+1, A Random Person a écrit :       > Let's say a torch missile (or anything) is on an intercept trajectory       towards a target.       > If the target makes a burn to counter, would it necessary take the same       amount of delta-v for the missile to keep the intercept?       >        > I suspect that it's a tradeoff between efficiency of plane changes and       oberth effect gains.              There are a lot of facters involved here, including (but definitely NOT       limited to) the initial velocities of both the target and the missile, the       performance capabilities of both (T/W ratios, Isp, propellant reserve, etc),       initial distance, initial and        subsequent closing rate (relative velocity), etc. Combat pilots frequently       refer to "missile envelopes", which not only determine how much energy a       missile must spend to hit a maneouvering target, but also the limits where       interception is even possible.       Yes, there are prefered trajectories, depending upon a specific envelope. Not       only is it not necessary for target and missile to expend the same delta-Vs,       but it is fairly rare that they will expend the same delta-V. Of course, it is       entirely possible,        if not probable, that the missile will have to expend more delta-V than the       target (especially if the target changes vector just prior to an expected       impact).        As a rule, IF possible, the best vector would be a leading intercept, where       the missile follows a straight line course to where the target is going to be,       rather than to simply remain pointed at the target all the time. This is       difficult with a        manoeuvering target. However, IF the flight envelop of a target is known, you       can at least reduce the amount of corrections (for instance, a target might be       travelling too fast to simply stop and turn, so you can be fairly confident in       a minimum lead        intercept vector).       Also, as a rule, the slower an object is moving, the less delta-V is required       to correct for an intercept course. The probem here is that too slow a       velocity could allow for a much easier escape. I recommend the book "Fighter       Combat: Tactics and        Maneuvering" by Robert Shaw.              Of course, things get MUCH more difficult when you take differing orbits into       account.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca