Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,775 of 45,986    |
|    Alien8752@gmail.com to eripe    |
|    Re: Particles-atoms hybrids    |
|    22 Jan 17 20:58:29    |
      From: nuny@bid.nes              On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 8:19:50 PM UTC-8, eripe wrote:       > >        > > The reflector would only have to be perfect at one wavelength.        >        > Tangent question. If its only perfect at one wavelength, how fast could it go       > before the redshift would make it melt.       >        > Also the crew would not see the redshift, would it still melt?               Doesn't matter; the speed of light is absolute, so the advancing trailing       surface and retreating leading surface (advancing and retreating from the       point of view of the contained light) is what makes the difference. It won't       be about speed so much as        acceleration- at any constant velocity the coating will have the right       reflectivity.               Very probably the coating can't be perfectly reflective at exactly one       wavelength but will have a narrow Bell-type curve, so there will be a       rate-of-change effect. In other words there'd be an acceleration limit before       it starts to burn through, as was        wanted in the EMdrive thread.                      Mark L. Fergerson              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca