Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,813 of 45,986    |
|    Mikkel Haaheim to Damien Valentine    |
|    Re: Light needs a surfac    |
|    20 Feb 17 12:06:10    |
      From: mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com              On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 4:32:22 PM UTC+1, Damien Valentine wrote:       > On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 5:45:00 AM UTC-5, ewu...@gmail.com wrote:       >       > > But, what if it was possible to detect a spot or point of light in just       air, without       > > the need of a surface for that spot/point to bounce of.       > > What would be the practical applications of such an invention.       >       > We already have those devices: they're called "digital cameras". (The       photons/waves don't bounce off anything -- they're focused by a lens, then       directly absorbed by a CCD and converted into electrical signals.)              I think you are misreading his admittedly imprecise question. I think, when he       refers to "bouncing off", he actually means "interacts with". In your example,       the light is interacting with the CCD.       In other words, I think he is asking what would happen if we could detect a       photon without interacting with that photon, either directly or indirectly.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca