Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,906 of 45,986    |
|    MrAnderson to All    |
|    High-Performance Interstellar Engines    |
|    30 Mar 17 08:48:45    |
      From: adam.w.krajewski@gmail.com              Huh, that's the topic I am interested also, because my warship will weigh       something like these 30000 tonnes, + the tug ship, that will carry all       antimatter for IS trip.       By what I have researches already, there is not much about the mass ratios       needed for travel (other than on Atomic Rockets), but they would surely be       horrible, which is not seens on Avatar's ISV.        About the drive, I have a problem, because even the Beamed Core AM Rocket       looses quite a lot of energy in some weird particles that don't interact with       our matter a lot, or to gamma rays. So, I think one must use all these gamma       rays by enclosing the        reaction in a lead pellet or something like that. Anyway, this is all       hypotetical, and it would be nice if someone more competent would answer to       you.        Although, I think that it's possible to make constant - thrust rocket, using       mix of antiparticles, some heavier metals as a propellant and also throw in       some hydrogen. But, talking about heavy propellant, it will probably increase       the thrust at the        expense of exhaust velocity. So, smaller Isp? But if you have higher       acceleration due to thrust, can you scale the engine so that it becomes same       as it would be in engine without heavy propellant?        Dang, that's too hard for me.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca