Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,972 of 45,986    |
|    els.dallas@gmail.com to Mr Anderson    |
|    Re: Interstellar Mutual Assured Destruct    |
|    17 May 17 01:28:26    |
      On Saturday, May 6, 2017 at 6:38:20 PM UTC-5, Mr Anderson wrote:       > as interstellar RKVs, and they are precise enough to hit the enemy planet in       enemy's system,               This is an incredible handwave.        .95c is a gamma factor of ~3.2.        At .95c and 1 g of maneuverability, you would travel 5 meters laterally and       285,000,000 meters along your previous course in 1 second of maneuvers. That       is a deviation of 17.5 nanoradians per second from your previous course in       your frame of reference.        But there is a gamma fact of 3, so 1 second for the RKKV is 3 seconds to an       outside observer. This thing can't functionally maneuver, dodge, or course       correct.               > Also, what could be a countermeasure to dense objects travelling at 0.95 c?       Because if there is such thing, it's not MAD anymore. An, at last, how could       the attacked system detect incoming missiles, when there are many possible       angles of attack? Could        there be a plausible justification for spies that observe the situation and       send signal to mothersystem if they see launch, so they can launch their       missiles?              Since it can't drunkwalk, maneuver, or dodge because it is traveling too fast,       just have a computer plot a firing solution based off of the Lorentz       transformations. The bigger it is, the longer the range that it can be       detected at.               The best defense is early warning systems. The earlier it is detected, the       farther away from anything valuable that it can be destroyed. For example, if       your detection range with a 10 meter diameter sensor is 10e9 km, then you will       have 27.7 seconds to        destroy it. But since we are talking RKKVs here, then your civilization should       be able to build sensors that are multiple kilometers in size. So for the same       RKKV, if your sensor has an aperture 100 km in diameter, then you have 3.47       hours of notice. And        the kicker is that the 100 km detector can be a sparsely populated array       composed of say 10,000 of the 10 meter telescopes linked together.               RKKVs are only a threat to low tech civilizations, which lack the industrial       might of their betters. Nicoll-Dyson Lasers on the other hand are terrifying       interstellar weapons, but at that point it is time to break out the Berseker       fleets.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca