Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,004 of 45,986    |
|    JF Mezei to Fred J. McCall    |
|    Re: Peter Thiel: What do you know that n    |
|    26 May 17 00:45:52    |
      XPost: sci.physics, sci.space.policy       From: jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca              On 2017-05-25 21:11, Fred J. McCall wrote:              > Yes and no. Again, Range Safety is primarily concerned with where the       > thing could conceivably come down and that's all physics.              In the case of an SRB, can you really predict where it would/could go if       it prematurely separated and flew like a wild firecracker?              Wouldn't there be preventative detonation instead of waitiong for teh       firecracker to become clear and present danger to land? (kill it after       malfiunction instead of waiting for it to start flying towards coast).                     Different slant:              Say the rocket worked flawlessly but a radio failure blocks telemetry       from reaching SpaceX. Does Range Safety have pre-calculated expected       position for every second of flight and as long as the rocket is       nominal, it lets it go, or would the loss of telemetry reception result       in decision to detonate ?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca