Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,005 of 45,986    |
|    JF Mezei to All    |
|    Re: Peter Thiel: What do you know that n    |
|    25 May 17 20:30:02    |
      XPost: sci.physics, sci.space.policy       From: jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca              On 2017-05-25 16:22, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:              > Telemetry. Though I believe during shuttle launches the decision was also              So a launch company such as SpaceX has to give the military the       acceptable flight envelope inside of which no range safety is needed,       and outside of which, range safety is needed.              Would this be what takes weeks to type onto the punched cards needed for       their 1970s computer to make the real time decision of whether the       rocket is within acceptable parameters?              Wouldn't it be simpler for the launch company to just send constant flow       of "OK" mesages (they do the validation of the flight performance) and a       "NOT OK" the micro second the rockets goes outside of flight envelope?              I find it odd that it would take so long to go from one launch to another.              Legally speaking, could SpaceX build and operate its own range safety       for KSC launches and not have to deal with the ancient military systems       ? Or does the military have legal right to demand that it be in charge       of range safety?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca