XPost: sci.physics, sci.space.policy   
   From: fjmccall@gmail.com   
      
   JF Mezei  wrote:   
      
   >On 2017-05-26 15:41, Fred J. McCall wrote:   
   >   
   >> I keep saying it and you keep not getting it.  Let me try again.   
   >>   
   >> IF THE VEHICLE DEPARTS THE RANGE SAFETY CORRIDOR THEY WILL TRIGGER THE   
   >> TTS/FTS.   
   >>   
   >> Is that clear enough?   
   >>   
   >   
   >My discussion has to do more with the definition of "range safety corridor".   
   >   
   >As the rockets goes further and further from land, I have to assume that   
   >a range safety corridor widens cosiderably more than the rocket's own   
   >trajectory corridor IF the goal of range safety is to protect property.   
   >   
      
   'Ships'?   
      
   >   
   >And blowing it up over the ocean generates rainfall of burning debris   
   >thatr has more chance of getting a ship than letting it crash into ocean   
   >as a single unit (smaller footprint).   
   >   
      
   Let's test that out, shall we?  Drop some dust on me and then drop a   
   big fucking rock on you and let's see which one of us gets hurt?   
      
      
   --   
   "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar   
    territory."   
                                         --G. Behn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)