XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics, sci.electronics.design   
      
   In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote:   
   > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>In sci.physics David Mitchell  wrote:   
   >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Could you be any more vague?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>"Vague"?  Do you not know what jewelry and such are?   
   >   
   > Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry?  Plastic jewelry?  ...or are   
   > you going to print gold?  BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened   
   > steel and water companies, too.   
      
   I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage   
   girls.   
      
   I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company.   
      
   Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless.   
      
   --   
   Jim Pennino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)