XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics, sci.electronics.design   
   From: fjmccall@gmail.com   
      
   jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
      
   >In sci.physics krw@notreal.com wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:15:28 -0700, Fred J. McCall   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>In sci.physics David Mitchell  wrote:   
   >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> OK, what "stuff" would people be making at home?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Jewellry, utilities, tools, gadgets.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Could you be any more vague?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>"Vague"?  Do you not know what jewelry and such are?   
   >>   
   >> Why on Earth would anyone print jewelry?  Plastic jewelry?  ...or are   
   >> you going to print gold?  BTW, I'd like to see you print hardened   
   >> steel and water companies, too.   
   >   
   >I can see a few, very few, people printing junk jewelry, mostly teenage   
   >girls.   
   >   
   >I can't see anyone printing an electric, gas, or water company.   
   >   
   >Tools and gadgets are so vague they are meaningless.   
   >   
      
   If you want to see a tool someone made at home, look in the mirror.   
      
      
   --   
   You are   
   What you do   
   When it counts.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)