home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.science      Real and speculative aspects of SF scien      45,986 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 45,165 of 45,986   
   Jeff Findley to All   
   Re: Towards the *fully* 3D-printed elect   
   16 Jul 17 16:15:36   
   
   XPost: sci.space.policy, sci.physics, sci.electronics.design   
   From: jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com   
      
   In article <1tls3e-me7.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > In sci.physics Jeff Findley  wrote:   
   > > In article , krw@notreal.com   
   > > says...   
   > >> The point is that CAD on minicomputers was very minimal.  It was the   
   > >> domain of the mainframe.  Rubylith was the tool of choice for the   
   > >> electronics industry.   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > > I've worked on CAE software that's tightly integrated with CAD my entire   
   > > professional life.  Back in about 1988 our CAD/CAE software still ran on   
   > > mainframes (IBM, DEC, and etc.) but the transition to Unix workstations   
   > > was in its infancy.  Back then, PCs were "toys" that quite simply   
   > > couldn't handle professional level CAD/CAE software.   
   > >   
   > > In the early 1990s Unix Workstations dominated for running CAD/CAE   
   > > software.  A good SGI "box" would run you about $20k in early 1990s   
   > > dollars (about $33k today).   
   > >   
   > > Today, you can comfortably run CAD/CAE software (at least the CAE   
   > > pre/post) on a sub $2k PC running Windows OS.  But many customers will   
   > > go quite a bit over $2k with things like solid state drives and 64 GB or   
   > > more of RAM coupled with the best professional graphics card money can   
   > > buy (no, they're not quite the same as consumer/gaming cards).  Still,   
   > > the most "decked out" PC workstation today will still cost a fraction of   
   > > what a Unix workstation used to cost in the early 1990s.   
   > >   
   > > So again, we see yet another example of improving technologies driving   
   > > down costs in a market.   
   >   
   > Nope, what we see is yet another example of consumer demand driving down   
   > manufacturing costs by encouraging high volume, automated, manufacturing.   
      
   Bullshit.  The technology in a PC today is quite different than that of   
   a PC made in 1988.  Nothing in a PC from 1988 would even "plug into" a   
   PC bought today, except maybe the keyboard and mouse.  And the PC today   
   is literally orders of magnitude faster.   
      
   Jeff   
   --   
   All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.   
   These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,   
   employer, or any organization that I am a member of.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca