Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,236 of 45,986    |
|    Luke Campbell to All    |
|    Re: Rocket combustion chamber size    |
|    20 Sep 17 16:24:21    |
      From: lwcamp@gmail.com              The equation as derived deals with waste heat delivered to the engine, not       total power. Most of that power goes into accelerating the propellant exhaust       gasses. Much of what is left over remains as thermal energy of the exhaust       gasses. The figure you        need is the power absorbed by the engine bell.              In addition, chemical rocket engines can use their cryogenic fuel to help cool       the engine bell, running it through pipes around the bell to transfer heat to       the propellant before combustion. This active cooling helps deal with the       heat load.              I can't remember the conversation where we were discussing this, but it may       have been while figuring out the limits of torch ship performance, in which       case the waste heat would be the x-rays absorbed by the surrounding structure,       and the energy imparted        by neutrons scattering off nuclei in the structure.               Luke              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca