Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,237 of 45,986    |
|    trident to All    |
|    Re: Rocket combustion chamber size    |
|    21 Sep 17 00:41:41    |
      From: trident5955@gmail.com              W dniu czwartek, 21 września 2017 01:24:23 UTC+2 użytkownik Luke Campbell       napisał:       > The equation as derived deals with waste heat delivered to the engine, not       total power. Most of that power goes into accelerating the propellant exhaust       gasses. Much of what is left over remains as thermal energy of the exhaust       gasses. The figure        you need is the power absorbed by the engine bell.       >        > In addition, chemical rocket engines can use their cryogenic fuel to help       cool the engine bell, running it through pipes around the bell to transfer       heat to the propellant before combustion. This active cooling helps deal with       the heat load.       >        > I can't remember the conversation where we were discussing this, but it may       have been while figuring out the limits of torch ship performance, in which       case the waste heat would be the x-rays absorbed by the surrounding structure,       and the energy        imparted by neutrons scattering off nuclei in the structure.        >        > Luke              Thank you VERY MUCH for response. Just one last question. Can you suggest some       reading? I'd love to learn what fraction of engine power ends up as waste heat       but I understand this may be too long topic for this thread. A book suggestion       would help.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca