Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,245 of 45,986    |
|    Ian Sturdy to All    |
|    Re: Starship Radiator Mass (WARNING: Con    |
|    04 Oct 17 12:39:09    |
      From: ianrsturdy@gmail.com              All those radiators seem to be operating at rather low temperatures--if you       could run at 2900K instead of 1450K, you would only need 1/16th the radiator       area. I expect a beryllium phase-change radiator would operate close to its       boiling point of 2742K,        giving a sizable advantage. Given also that the molybdenum/lithium radiator is       four times the weight per heat capacity as the best radiators on that page,       which also operate at low temperatures, I would not be surprised if much       better were possible.              I also expect your 20% estimate to be high--the trick in fusion engines seems       to be running the fusion reaction very far from any solid components. The       Firefly certainly seems to be designed around that, with the very narrow body       and conical tail        minimizing its apparent aspect. Moreover, 50% of your waste heat is x-rays,       which will not be completely absorbed by small thicknesses of matter.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca