Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,257 of 45,986    |
|    johnny1a.again@gmail.com to Greg Goss    |
|    Re: Spinning up a Ringworld.    |
|    09 Oct 17 19:48:24    |
      On Friday, March 17, 2017 at 3:11:33 AM UTC-5, Greg Goss wrote:       > In one of the Ringworld novels, Either Louis or someone explaining to       > Louis points out the truly humungeous amount of hydrogen that would       > have been consumed spinning up the artifact.       >        > Bussard Ramjets are canon in this series, and were used by the       > builders of the Ringworld. So you have a humungeous supply of       > hydrogen in the solar wind.              Do we?              In absolute terms, how much hydrogen is the star throwing off? How long do       you have to wait for it to spray out enough hydrogen to spin up the Ring?        IIRC, the kinetic energy of the rotating Ring (which was spinning at .004c and       massed the same as        Jupiter. That's a lot of energy, so we're going to need a lot of hydrogen.              Remember that we can't capture all the solar wind unless we through a true       Dyson Sphere around it, too, so whatever we capture is only a fraction of the       total.              A Bussard drive works (or at least it works in fiction) because the ship is       moving close to the speed of light and the intake-field sweeps out a huge       swath of space in a unit of time. That wouldn't apply to the attitude jets of       Ringworld.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca