Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,301 of 45,986    |
|    Damien Valentine to melvin...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Effectiveness of laser weaponry, AKA    |
|    15 Feb 18 17:25:06    |
      From: valends3@gmail.com              On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 1:45:56 AM UTC-5, melvin...@gmail.com wrote:       > Given enough power and/or time they can chew there way through       anything(right?). They don't require heavy ammo that a ship would have to lug       around.              The question answers itself: a situation where the combatants *aren't* given       enough power and/or time, is a situation where lasers would be inferior       weapons.              Also, because everybody's moving around at kilometers-per-second speeds, your       ammunition doesn't actually need to be all that heavy. See the Atomic Rockets       website, where -- I believe on the "conventional weapons" page -- the author       proposes using kitty-       litter as ammunition. (Presumably an actual weapon would use sand,       ball-bearings, flechettes, or something similar.) You don't need huge honkin'       artillery shells.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca