home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.science      Real and speculative aspects of SF scien      45,986 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 45,301 of 45,986   
   Damien Valentine to melvin...@gmail.com   
   Re: Effectiveness of laser weaponry, AKA   
   15 Feb 18 17:25:06   
   
   From: valends3@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 1:45:56 AM UTC-5, melvin...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > Given enough power and/or time they can chew there way through   
   anything(right?). They don't require heavy ammo that a ship would have to lug   
   around.   
      
   The question answers itself: a situation where the combatants *aren't* given   
   enough power and/or time, is a situation where lasers would be inferior   
   weapons.   
      
   Also, because everybody's moving around at kilometers-per-second speeds, your   
   ammunition doesn't actually need to be all that heavy.  See the Atomic Rockets   
   website, where -- I believe on the "conventional weapons" page -- the author   
   proposes using kitty-   
   litter as ammunition.  (Presumably an actual weapon would use sand,   
   ball-bearings, flechettes, or something similar.)  You don't need huge honkin'   
   artillery shells.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca