Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.science    |    Real and speculative aspects of SF scien    |    45,986 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 45,323 of 45,986    |
|    Luke Campbell to Klaus Meinhard    |
|    Re: Effectiveness of laser weaponry, AKA    |
|    19 Feb 18 15:37:28    |
      From: lwcamp@gmail.com              On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 12:08:18 AM UTC-8, Klaus Meinhard wrote:       >        > Not counting Star-Trek-like "shields", a simple mirror could deflect       > 99.9% of the laser energy              This is true if the laser is sufficiently diffuse (in fact, modern dielectric       mirrors can reach 99.9999% reflectivity at a specific wavelength). However,       mirrors fail if the irradiation is too intense. At ranges where the beam can       be focused to a spot        significantly smaller than the aperture, expect the mirror to heat up to the       point that its reflectivity decreases, causing additional absorption of       energy, resulting in a further decrease in reflectivity, to produce a runaway       failure. For laser        machining, even highly reflective aluminum (98 to 99% reflectivity) will still       absorb around 50% of the beam energy. Laser weapons could be expected to       operate at similar intensity regimes (or higher, for pulsed lasers). At high       intensities, you get a        boundary layer of plasma that mediates between the beam and material. The       plasma absorbs the beam, and transfers the beam's heat to the material. At       this point, the reflectivity of the material becomes irrelevant.              > while the rest may be spread around by a good       > heat spreading design of the hull.              At the fluences typical of weapons-grade lasers, I find that thermal       conductivity is a negligible effect to the ability of the beam to penetrate       material.              > And this energy must be produced and       > stored somehow in intervals (I doubt that a death-ray like continuous       > laser of sufficient energy is possible because of heat problems).              Modern laser weapons (typically in the 60 to 150 kW range) are able to fire       continuously using the power from Diesel generators, or generators turned by a       ship's motor (ship in this case meaning an actual ship - one of those things       that goes across the        top of the water - not a spacecraft). It is generally accepted that future       lasers in the several MW range can be fired continuously from future ship       designs engineered to produce power to directed energy weapons and       electromagnetic cannons.              Luke              Luke              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca